|
|
Post by Stephen on Dec 31, 2012 6:04:50 GMT
Warriors get:
Monta Ellis 12/13: 11M 13/14: 11M TO: listed on spreadsheet as TO but real life is a PO
George Hill: 12-16: 8M
0.85M cash considerations (if specific player is needed il say Ellis)
Pacers get:
Stephen Curry 13: 3.96M 14: QO
Tyreke Evans 13: 5.25M 14: QO
Brandon Roy 13: 5.1M 14. 5.33M
Warriors accept this trade. We do this because we love Ellis. While we are taking a huge gamble with the PO, we feel its a risk we can take. We also get a good PG in Hill. Production here is very similar and the deal puts us at exactly cap. We trade 2 RFAs, a lesser risk, for 1 PO, a larger risk. However, because we get a fave, we accept this deal good deal and good luck Pacers.
|
|
|
|
Post by Domingo on Dec 31, 2012 6:10:38 GMT
Pacers Accept:
Ellis is also one of my favorite players and has been on fire lately but i felt like turning him into Curry would be more ideal for my team since Curry is cheaper and more safer because of the PO. Hill is a very good fantasy player and im taking a risk on Evans for him. Curry and Evans are also cheap for this year and next year,(Then they are RFA's that i can actually afford) As for Roy im 90% sure hes going to be dumped in this offseason because of a retirement, but maybe by some miracle he plays next year.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nuggets GM (Joe) on Dec 31, 2012 6:12:14 GMT
Monta Ellis do not have PO for next year, he has TO for next year, please make the change according before we can start to vote.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stephen on Dec 31, 2012 6:19:52 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Former Spurs GM (Adam) on Dec 31, 2012 23:27:33 GMT
On the spreadsheet (which is what we have to use), Monta has a TO.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stephen on Jan 1, 2013 0:35:58 GMT
How does it make any sense to contradict his real life salary?
|
|
|
|
Post by Former Spurs GM (Adam) on Jan 1, 2013 4:14:18 GMT
We may need the LMs to look at this before voting.
Just to mention, sooner or later, all salaries in our league will not reflect the real ones. The spreadsheet is a great way of keeping up with the amounts used in this league. Thanks for your patience sir.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stephen on Jan 1, 2013 4:17:13 GMT
Agreed
Yes soon we will soon use non NBA contracts
But we should try and use the correct ones before making the transition
|
|
|
|
Post by Domingo on Jan 1, 2013 7:39:11 GMT
Warriors you can make the change, I'm fine with dealing as a To
|
|
|
|
Post by Stephen on Jan 1, 2013 7:41:32 GMT
Ok that's fine
Edited and can be voted upon
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 1, 2013 8:01:52 GMT
Looks fair to me, both players that Pacers is getting should cost more than what Hill and Ellis cost atm
Approve (1-0)
|
|
|
|
Post by Nuggets GM (Joe) on Jan 1, 2013 8:06:37 GMT
Approve 2-0
|
|
|
|
Post by Former Spurs GM (Adam) on Jan 1, 2013 10:22:47 GMT
Approve (3-0)
|
|
|
|
Post by Celtics GM (Jose) on Jan 1, 2013 21:58:58 GMT
Processed on ESPN.
|
|
|
|
Post by Thunder GM (Tiago) on Jan 2, 2013 0:43:49 GMT
I used hoopsworld to all my contract info.
In there, Elis has a ET or Early Termination.
And even if its closest to a PO in real life than it is to a TO, in here, we made all options and terminations equal to TO to make the league easier, except the actual PO
So, everything that is not a PO, we changed to TO to make our life easier.
|
|
