|
Post by Nuggets GM (Joe) on Dec 28, 2012 12:09:14 GMT
Utah trade: Brandon Jennings 12/13 3.18M, 13/14 4.33M (QO)
for
Denver trade: Luke Babbit 12/13 0.50M 2013 Denver 1st 2013 Det 2nd 2013 NYK 2nd 2013 Nets 2nd 2014 Tor 2nd
I agree, I am acquire a good pg which i am lack of, and help me to compete this year
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 28, 2012 13:40:08 GMT
I accept this trade I have two other point guards on my team and loooking to rebuild for a few years down the line. It's going to tak at least two years to do and I'm willing to do it.
|
|
|
Post by Thunder GM (Tiago) on Dec 28, 2012 18:53:38 GMT
I'm approving this because the 2013 2nd Rounds of DET, NYK and BRO are going to be very early 2nd's.
So, it's a mid 1st (this trade makes DEN stronger) and three very early 2nd this season, plus another 2nd in 2014 for a very strong PG with a QO for next season.
Approve (1-0)
|
|
|
Post by Former Spurs GM (Adam) on Dec 29, 2012 0:03:01 GMT
Jennings has the name value/track record of a top tier player. I'm surprised there is only one first rounder in this trade even with his 1 yr/QO contract.
Just trying to look at precedents, Al Jefferson and Josh Smith (both on one year contracts) needed more than one first rounder to be traded. On the other hand, OJ Mayo and Metta World Peace are hovering in the same range as Jennings on the player rater, and basically were traded for one mediocre pick each plus little stuff. Whereas Mayo and World Peace are outperforming expectations, there's very little doubt that Jennings will continue to produce as he has so far, or better.
In my opinion, Jennings is bordering on elite - much closer to the Josh Smith/Al Jefferson range and even with his contract should return something a little more substantial. (I also probably assign far less value to second rounders - even high ones - than others may)
Sorry to do this...
Veto (1-1)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 29, 2012 3:08:26 GMT
Non TC post
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 29, 2012 17:09:43 GMT
Do I like it? No, I think it's a bad move on Utah's part, BUT it is a lot of picks and possibly high picks..so
Approve (2-1)
|
|
|
Post by Celtics GM (Jose) on Dec 30, 2012 18:02:40 GMT
After a lot of thought put into it, i agree with Adam.
Not only it's not a lot for a player of Jennings caliber, a top PG this season and improving every year, compared to Jefferson and Smith but also his contract is different due to the QO and that would allow the Nuggets to keep him unlike the duo mentioned above.
With this in mind, i do believe it's an extreme underpay.
Vetoed (2-2)
|
|
|
Post by Lakers GM (Renato) on Dec 30, 2012 19:20:07 GMT
I doubt that any of those picks will net anyone as good as Brandon Jennings and increasing the number of picks being traded is not enough. I'm not a Jennings fan but fantasy wise he's closer to Josh Smith/Al Jefferson than most people think.
This is a veto (2-3)
|
|