|
Post by Nuggets GM (Joe) on Dec 28, 2013 0:42:28 GMT
Denver Trade: 2014 Ind 2nd
for
Orlando Trade: Ed Davis 3.15M (13/14) 4.16M (14/15, QO)
Jarret Jack 3.99M (13/14) 4.39M (14/15) 4.83M (15/16) 5.31M (16/17)
I accept, Jack's contract for next year may affect my ability to resign my QO players (most important one of all: Cousins), but the chance someone want to clean house and doesn't affect my current look is rare, so I have to take the chance and worry about the cap later. I will drop Randy Foye if the trade pass.
|
|
|
Post by Jay on Dec 28, 2013 0:45:43 GMT
I accept. I'm getting rid of everything. Joe wa shuts the first one around to deal with,
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 28, 2013 0:55:13 GMT
Sorry guys, I don't think this is fair at all. I'd like to hear more reasoning from Jay before making my vote though. Seems like he just doesn't give a shit so he's trading players for pennies on the dollar.
|
|
|
Post by Jay on Dec 28, 2013 1:08:04 GMT
Okay simply put I'm looking to clear out my roster for the offseason. Sure jack and Davis have more value then a pick in the 50s but no one was interested in giving me anything for my bench players. I need them all gone by the offseason and the best way for me to do that is to either drop them or deal them away. If you veto it's fine with me just expect to see those players hit the waiver wire soon.
|
|
|
Post by Lakers GM (Renato) on Dec 28, 2013 1:19:15 GMT
The problem with this trade is that it isn't fair to the rest of the league. Joe is getting two free players to help his title run and the other contenders have no say in that. Even though I'm not personally affected by the outcome of this trade, there's no way I can allow that. There's a waiver wire and there are possibilities to sign them as FA's once they clear waivers.
I don't think it's fair, so...
Veto (0-1)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 28, 2013 7:31:45 GMT
I'd rather not vote as I don't want to have a conflict of interest in Joe's team becoming better, but I think if this was any team I'd still veto. Jack and Davis still get good minutes and a 2nd isn't close to being enough for this haul. Sorry guys.
VETO (0-2)
|
|
|
Post by Thunder GM (Tiago) on Dec 28, 2013 11:23:42 GMT
Not even close, obviously.
Veto (0-3)
|
|