|
Post by Cavs GM (Matthew) on Jan 16, 2014 0:26:17 GMT
And just because one player doesn't produce much on a regular basis, doesn't always mean he won't produce. he could still have a breakout game that could benefit your team. You don't know that a player isn't going to score or get a board before the game.
|
|
|
Post by Kyle on Jan 16, 2014 8:36:01 GMT
injured or not.... especially if they are day to day...... if their team has a game i put them in..... if i have 8 or more ppl playing any said night.... then i will look to tweak my roster
|
|
|
TANKING
Jan 16, 2014 23:30:36 GMT
via mobile
Post by Former Spurs GM (Adam) on Jan 16, 2014 23:30:36 GMT
Who knows? There's just no way of telling when Shelvin Mack or Jason Terry will have a very nice game. Maybe even on a day with a light schedule. Shelvin Mack >> Jerryd Bayless >> Nate Robinson >>>>> Amare Stoudemire* = Things could always be worse. *all opinions are subjective, and don't necessarily reflect those of the author.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 16, 2014 23:32:34 GMT
Lol that's great ^
|
|
|
Post by Grizzlies GM (Max) on Jan 17, 2014 3:37:42 GMT
Yes; however, my argument is that there are 3 cats they could hurt me in: FG%, FT%, and TOs. I rather keep them out at some points and risk missing a (once in a very blue moon) breakout game to keep those 3 stats up. So, yes, my strategy is warranted
|
|
|
Post by Nuggets GM (Joe) on Jan 17, 2014 4:15:17 GMT
In that case, if you have a strategy, that's different. Sorry about this, but there's team not putting their best players or players at all because of this reason.
And I really hope everyone can really do what we suppose to do to make this league better.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 17, 2014 5:32:07 GMT
I think those three stats don't warrant keeping guys like that out. Especially if your talking 3 cats vs 6 that you could benefit from. If your talking #s then percentages show you have a better chance of positively effecting your team then you do negatively. If it's a close game and your winning in FG, FT, TOs and don't wanna make them worst, then ya I understand. But just not putting them in for that reason isn't warranted in my opinion.
|
|
|
TANKING
Jan 17, 2014 9:30:33 GMT
via mobile
Post by Former Spurs GM (Adam) on Jan 17, 2014 9:30:33 GMT
Sorry, I wasn't trying to criticize anyone Memphis. Just having fun. I agree there are reasons to be selective and applaud someone who calculates that decision.
|
|
|
Post by Suns GM (Roberto) on Jan 17, 2014 12:19:19 GMT
Yes; however, my argument is that there are 3 cats they could hurt me in: FG%, FT%, and TOs. I rather keep them out at some points and risk missing a (once in a very blue moon) breakout game to keep those 3 stats up. So, yes, my strategy is warranted 1st of all, MEM was not the reason i started this. I just wanted do prove that more than 2 teams were not setting their lineups. Imo, that argument is valid if you're winning those cats on a sunday, and even so, it depends on how you're doing on 3PM, stls, pts... Yesterday you left JT out of the lineup again and he had 5 pts on 2-7 FG, 0-0 FT, 1 3PM, 1 reb, 7 ass, 1 stl, 0 TO. Did leaving him out did any good to your team? I know that yesterday was a blue moon, but i've lost several matchups by 1 3PM, or stl, etc. If you had Michael Carter-Williams, that hurts you in FG%, FT% and TO's, would you leave him out? What i have been seeing (again, this is not a shot at MEM) is teams that are losing their matchups, sometimes 4-5, and leave players out of the lineups that without knowing if they could reverse the result, or are simply trying to lose.
|
|